To Save the Man by John Sayles

Published by Melville House on January 21, 2025

The story told in To Save the Man culminates (more or less) with the Wounded Knee Massacre, yet the massacre itself occupies only a few pages. Readers who want to learn more about the tragic event (and even those who don’t) would benefit from reading Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee.

To Save the Man's focus is on a school for Native American children who were sent by their families (under durress) to learn English and the white man’s ways. Jacques LaMere sends his son Antoine because the government will not recognize Jacques, whose father was a French Canadian, as an enrolled member of the Ojibwe unless his child is in an Indian school.

Indian schools were part of the disastrous federal policy of assimilating Indians — meaning, making them more like white people — or killing them. After Antoine takes a train to Pennsylvania, the story follows Antoine’s adaptation to life at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School. The school is run by Captain Richard Henry Pratt, whose motto is: “To save the man, we must kill the Indian.” Students were not allowed to speak their own language, pray to their own god, or follow their own customs, lest they not learn to be white. After all, white people are civilized and Indians aren’t — just ask the white people.

Most Indians have been herded onto reservations, but the government’s latest plan is to take the reservation land, divide it into allotments, and deed an allotment to enrolled tribal members. The expectation, of course, is that Indians can be manipulated into selling their land to white people for less than it is worth (which isn’t much), making this yet another scheme to benefit white people at the expense of their nonwhite victims. No doubt the robber barons who ran the country at the time thought they were making America great again.

The novel’s background is familiar, but it is always worth remembering how tragically out nation has treated nonwhite people, Native Americans first among them. Unfortunately, the story adds little to the background. We meet a Paiute known as the Messiah, who has had a vision of a “great upheaval” that will restore the buffalo and swallow the white men, thus returning the Earth to “how it was before the whites came.” At the Creator’s direction, the Messiah teaches people a “ghost dance” that will hasten the upheaval. We also spend a few pages in the vicinity of Sitting Bull, just before he is killed by the police.

We meet other students, including Herbert Sweetcorn, Jesse Echohawk, Clarence Regal, and a young man known as Trouble. Some students are quick to learn but feel conflicted about the use they should make of their knowledge. Some students have adventures of their own, including fleeing from the school and riding on freight trains until they get caught. Some students have visions of romance. Miss Redbird, a teacher at the school, feels like a traitor for speaking to children in English who can’t understand her.

The story flits from character to character, never spending enough time with any of them to permit full development. The novel feels like a collection of characters in search of a meaty story. Each has a small story that illustrates the American government’s crappy treatment of Indians, but the stories fail to add up to anything larger.

The ghost dances eventually spook white soldiers into slaughtering hundreds of Indians at Wounded Knee. Perhaps John Sayles wanted to avoid glorifying the massacre, but in doing so, he deprived the scene of its inherent drama. Much the same can be said of the rest of the story. It’s interesting but lacks the forceful telling that such a horrifying time in American history deserves. Fiction can reveal new truths about history, but To Save the Man reveals little that most people who pay attention to history don’t already know. The novel nevertheless has value as a reminder of white America’s past that many would prefer to bury.

RECOMMENDED WITH RESERVATIONS

A True Verdict by Robert Rotstein

Published by Blackstone Publishing on January 14, 2025

A True Verdict milks the comedic side of people whose political viewpoints dictate their opinions about subjects that have nothing to do with politics. A discharged employee’s claim of whistleblower retaliation and race discrimination is turned upside down by the novel’s end. Robert Rotstein uses melodrama and silly plot twists to lighten the story, but by the end, sharply divided jurors share an aha moment and unite in a mutual desire for justice — whatever that turns out to be.

Told from multiple points of view, the story follows jury deliberations at the end of a civil trial. Most chapter narrators are jurors, although significant contributions are made by the lawyers, the judge, a judge’s law clerk, a lawyer’s assistant, and a blogger. Occasional excerpts from transcripts acquaint the reader with key trial testimony.

The plaintiff is Ellison Picard. Both his first and last names will be recognizable to science fiction fans. Picard is a young Black man with a spinal fracture that confines him to a wheelchair.

Picard worked for MediMiracle as a statistician. MediMiracle is a startup drug company that has developed only one product, but it will be revolutionary and extraordinarily profitable if it works. The company claims that the drug cures all addictions — drugs, alcohol, sex, whatever. If the product works, it will clearly save lives.

Picard claims he reviewed the drug’s post-approval testing data and discovered a life-endangering side effect that is disproportionately harmful to Black patients. He claims he blew the whistle, that he was fired for doing so, and that the company invented a story about his violent behavior to justify his discharge. He sued the company for race discrimination and for violating a law that protects whistleblowers.

The company claims it fired Picard because he attacked his employer’s CEO in the company’s lobby. Like many disputes that go to trial, the truth depends on which side’s witnesses the jury believes.

After a transcript excerpt sets the scene, the story begins with the eight jurors filing out of the courtroom. Picard’s lawyer, M. Bailey Klaus, introduces the reader to MediMiracle’s CEO and founder, Peyton Burke, “a Forbes Magazine billionaire, stylish, attractive, and not yet forty years old” who “doesn’t fear losing. What mega-rich sociopath does?”

The lawyer representing MediMiracle and Burke does fear losing. She worked under Klaus’ supervision at his former firm before she stole his clients. Her performance in the trial will either enhance or destroy her self-esteem, not to mention her continued employment if she costs her firm its biggest client.

We then meet a quirky group of jurors. Two will not last long after they are caught in an amusing violation of the rules governing juror fraternization. The remaining jurors are a veterinary technician, a scientist, a retiree who is fighting a losing battle against a lung disease, a cleaner who has been a naturalized citizen for two decades, a far-right furniture store owner, and a far-left editor. They disagree about everything, sometimes with colorful language. One juror sees Burke as an admirable role model for women while another regards her as an arrogant bitch.

The political opinions of the jurors who have any are exaggerated for comedic effect. Even funnier are the jurors who base their decisions on factors that are just as irrelevant as politics. The cleaner brings the most common sense and the least prejudice to the jury room.

Much of the story involves the bickering of jurors who initially have difficulties setting aside their preconceptions about the parties, the lawyers, and each other. Additional humor comes from the issues that sidetrack the jury. In my favorite example, a juror explains that facial expressions are indicative of lying by telling detailed stories about relatives or boyfriends who made those expressions.

The story touches upon serious questions of racial identity, racism, and corporate disregard of employees' rights. It uses those questions as a backdrop for humor, not to explore burning social issues. Some readers might find some of the humor to be offensive, but Robert Rotstein offends the left and right with equal vigor. Readers who relax and laugh at the parts they find funny will probably like the book in the end.

Subplots include Klaus’ misunderstanding of his assistant’s feelings about him and the law clerk’s hilarious attempts to influence the judge’s decisions in the case. They add to the story’s goofiness.

A True Verdict could be used to teach a course in small-group decision-making. Each juror has a different style. One is pushy. One is insecure. One is accusatory. One is timid. They have almost nothing in common except a desire to carry out a civic duty as best they can.

Will the jurors set aside their differences and dig through the evidence until they find something they can agree to be true? The story is too biting to be pollyannish, but it’s told with good humor. It pokes fun at people of all political persuasions while reflecting the hope that most people can overcome divisive issues and behave decently when it matters.

RECOMMENDED

Presumed Guilty by Scott Turow

Published by Grand Central Publishing on January 14, 2025

My favorite novels about the nature of law and justice are The Ox-Bow Incident and A Covenant with Death. My favorite novels that mock the legal system are Bleak House and A Frolic of His Own. My favorite novel about a trial is To Kill a Mockingbird. My favorite legal thriller is Presumed Innocent. I highly recommend them all.

Published in 1987, Presumed Innocent told the story of Rusty Sabin, a prosecutor who was wrongly accused of killing an illicit lover. Sabin, by then an appellate judge, was accused of killing his wife in the follow-up novel, 2010’s Innocent. Presumed Guilty marks Sabin’s third starring role, this time as a defense attorney rather than a defendant.

The categories I invented for my list of favorite novels about the law overlap. All are represented in Presumed Guilty. Sabin entertains the reader with his hard-earned opinions about the relationship between law and justice. At times, the novel mocks the legal system, although Scott Turow does so by depicting it accurately. The system too often mocks itself.

Rusty Sabin respects the law but has been known to break it. He is easily forgiven for harmless and well-intended transgressions. Given his experiences, Sabin harbors an understandable contempt for those who place the freedom of others at risk by undermining rights that are essential to a fair trial.

Through Sabin, Turow spotlights the criminal justice system’s imperfections and explains why they impair an accused’s opportunity to have a fair shake against the government. Without lecturing, he identifies social problems — racism, the growing belief that facts are whatever you want them to be — and illustrates how they stain the justice system.

Turow also mocks prosecutors who see themselves as avenging warriors, a self-important conception that excuses any violation of rules that stand in the way of a conviction. Turow reminds us that prosecutors have a dark history of excluding Blacks from juries, hiding exculpatory evidence, and violating court orders to keep silent about inadmissible evidence, among other offenses.

While Presumed Guilty thus earns praise for its astute analysis of a flawed legal system, it also excels as a legal thriller. It isn’t as fresh or astonishing as Presumed Innocent, but it tells a compelling story that, like many legal thrillers, centers upon a whodunit mystery. Is the defendant guilty and, if not, can the reader identify the true culprit? As is often the case in the real world, evidence is murky and open to interpretation. Turow lets the suspense build before the reader learns the (somewhat) surprising and (mostly) plausible truth.

Because this is how Sabin’s life has gone, the story centers on a crime that touches his family. Sabin has retired and is living in a quiet place outside of Kindle County. He lives with Bea and her adopted son Aaron. On Sabin’s 75th birthday, Bea agreed to marry him, but they haven’t set a date.

Aaron is a 22-year-old Black man who abused drugs during his teens. He was joined in that addiction by Mae Potter, with whom he fell madly in love. Mae has a streak of wildness that, combined with narcissism, compulsive behavior, and moments of deep depression, make her a difficult girlfriend and a challenge to her family’s high place in the county’s social hierarchy.

Mae’s grandfather, Mansfield “Mansy” Potter, is Sabin’s best friend in the county. Mae’s father, Harrison “Hardy” Potter, is the county’s prosecuting attorney. Sabin tolerates Hardy for the sake of his friendship with Hardy’s father.

Aaron is on probation because he was arrested while holding Mae’s drugs. He isn’t allowed to leave the county. Sabin becomes concerned when Aaron is late returning from a camping trip with Mae. He will be forced to report Aaron’s absence if he doesn’t come home. Although Aaron finally returns, Mae doesn’t. Nor does Aaron seem overly concerned about her disappearance.

Aaron will be charged with Mae’s murder when her decomposing body is found in her wrecked car some weeks later. It doesn’t help that he apparently flees when the body is discovered, only to be arrested when he makes a mysterious appearance at the place where Mae’s body was found. Was he there to destroy evidence, as the prosecutor contends?

A pathologist concludes that Mae died of strangulation. Against his better judgment, Sabin agrees to represent Aaron for lack of a more skilled and affordable alternative. I doubt any lawyer who has never defended a murder case would start by representing his fiancé’s adopted son, but Turow creates a background that makes the representation plausible, if not inevitable. Anyway, the story just wouldn’t be as good if Sabin didn’t defend the case.

Turow plants clues that could incriminate other suspects, including Hardy and Bea. Sabin seizes the clues to create doubt in the prosecution’s case. The reader will use them to ponder the killer’s identity — unless Mae committed suicide, a possibility that the forensic evidence suggests. But how does that theory account for the absence of a rope around her neck when it was recovered from the wrecked car? And how did a similar rope end up in Sabin’s garage?

Courtroom scenes make or break legal thrillers. Turow is the genre’s master of capturing the drama of a riveting cross-examination. He also reveals the “inside baseball” of criminal defense, the strategic choices that lawyers make minute-by-minute in response to the changing trial dynamic. Courtroom politics are central to the story, given the prosecutor’s contempt for the judge — and for the law when it gets in the way of his self-righteous belief that only he is the true arbiter of justice.

Aaron might be Turow’s most sympathetic character. He has a tough but credible backstory. He has learned that he needs to embrace truths rather than run from them. That guiding principle makes him want to testify, pitting him against Sabin’s fear that the jury will want to convict him as soon as it learns about his history of drug abuse and probation violations.

This is Turow’s best novel since Presumed Innocent. It mixes a credible mystery with a suspenseful trial that leads to surprising revelations. Sabin digs deep within himself to resolve conflicting feelings about his relationships with Bea, Mansy, and Aaron. The story reveals powerful truths about the law but doesn’t let them slow the pace of an engaging story.

RECOMMENDED

The Forger's Requiem by Bradford Morrow

Published by Atlantic Monthly Press on January 14, 2025

The Forger’s Requiem is the third (and presumably final) book in a series that began with The Forger and continued with The Forger’s Daughter. The forger is Will Gardener. His daughter, Nicole Diehl, is also a forger, or at least she became one in The Forger’s Daughter due to the machinations of Will’s enemy, Henry Slader. The Forger’s Requiem recounts the essentials of the backstory so a reader can enjoy the final novel without reading the first two.

The rest of this review might contain a spoiler for readers who haven’t read the first two novels but plan to do so. Govern yourself accordingly.

Slader is a rival forger who, in the first novel, “cleaved off several of Will’s fingers in a mad assault that landed the man behind bars for a good long stretch.” The second novel follows Slader’s scheme to enlist Will’s cooperation in plan to sell a first edition of an Edgar Allen Poe book with the author’s forged signature. Slader uses blackmail to induce Will’s cooperation. At the novel’s end, Nicole liberates her father by smacking Slader on the head with a shovel that they then use to dig his grave.

The Forger’s Requiem begins with Slader rising from the dead. Of course, Slader isn’t dead, but was mistaken for a corpse when Will and Nicole interred him. This seems appropriate, as Will is obsessed with Poe, who “buried his characters alive with impressive regularity.”

Slader realizes that his life has “amounted to little more than a wasteland of mistakes,” but he needs money to disappear and live out his days as a hermit. He again resorts to blackmail — this time choosing Nicole as his victim — by threatening to release the blackmail material that he has been holding against Will.

Nicole wants to protect her father but is even more interested in learning whether the material is authentic. If so, her father might be something of a monster. Nicole is morally flexible about forgery but brutal murder is on another level. She ponders this dilemma while finding a girlfriend with whom she can share clever banter.

Slader needs Nicole to fabricate a series of letters written by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. To get into the spirit, Nicole visits England, learns all she can about Shelley, speculates about Shelley’s life, and shares her literary insights with her new lover. Fans of Frankenstein or its author should enjoy the deep dive into Shelley’s life, just as fans of Poe might enjoy the earlier novels.

Nicole develops a measure of sympathy for Slader as they chat over tea. Their erudite conversations, like Nicole’s banter with her lover and the story’s literary asides, make the book seem very civilized. That makes a savage ending an interesting contrast, albeit one that seems unlikely and a bit forced. I nevertheless recommend the trilogy to fans of literary crime fiction. Readers who don’t have time to read them all can get the flavor of the series by reading The Forger’s Requiem.

RECOMMENDED

Downstate by Jeffery Deaver

Published by Amazon Original Stories on January 14, 2025

Jeffery Deaver has written a few novellas for the Amazon Original Stories series. The story “Dodge” in his Broken Doll series introduced Special Agent Constant Marlowe. Constant’s own series of stories began with “The Rule of Threes” and continues in “Downstate.”

Constant is a boxer. That isn’t quite enough to sustain interest in her character over the course of a novel, a problem that Deaver accommodates by featuring her in shorter works where her absent personality might be less noticeable.

Constant works for the Illinois Department of Criminal Investigations. She starts the story by being shipped downstate to Plains County, a place that has more in common with the deep South than the progressive North. Her mission is to identify and find Mr. X, take him into custody, and persuade him to testify against Tyson Barth, a mobster in the Chicago suburbs.

Mr. X specializes in finding information. How he does this is a detail Deaver doesn't bother to explain. Barth hired Mr. X to identify two witnesses who have agreed to testify against him. Barth presumably intends to kill the snitches when he learns their identities. Since Mr. X takes as much pride in keeping his secrets as he does in learning the secrets of others, his true identity is a mystery. Although he feels no guilt about laying the groundwork for murder until he meets Constant, he feels embarrassed when she guides him on a path toward reform. I felt a bit embarrassed at my attempt to swallow any of this.

Constant enlists the help of Plains County Sheriff William Dodd and of Deputy Trenton Carr. Because someone in law enforcement has likely been leaking information to Barth, the reader will know that at least one of the cops is untrustworthy.

In an episode that appears to be unrelated to the central story (so, of course, it isn’t), a young man named Felipe Vargas steals some gift cards from a convenience store. A man in the store gives chase. Constant, who is visiting the store to buy milk and cookies (how wholesome can a woman get?), chases the man to keep him from beating the teen too badly. This encounter branches into a story about sex trafficking, the default option of thriller writers who want to shock readers but can’t come up with an original idea.

In another episode, two tough guys try to intimidate Constant. As other stories in the series have demonstrated, Constant likes to resolve such problems by securing her gun before challenging the tough guys to a boxing match. After knocking them to the ground, she arrests them or decides that a good beating was punishment enough for acting like a tough guy. Her behavior is more than a little ridiculous — I can’t imagine her not facing discipline for challenging perps to fistfights — but it seems to be her signature.

Constant devises a scheme to find Mr. X, which leads her to some dirty cops, which leads her to fear that a cop is endangering Vargas, which causes her to snatch Vargas as she devises a way to turn Mr. X against Barth and save Illinois from another of those dreaded sex trafficking rings. The plot fails to convey a sense of reality but I was almost willing to suspend my disbelief until the final scenes bestow an out-of-the-blue happy ending on one of the characters. Unable to overcome my gag reflex, I downgraded a tepid but full recommendation to a limited recommendation for diehard Deaver fans and readers who love happy endings, no matter how forced they might be.

RECOMMENDED WITH RESERVATIONS