The Tzer Island book blog features book reviews written by TChris, the blog's founder.  I hope the blog will help readers discover good books and avoid bad books.  I am a reader, not a book publicist.  This blog does not exist to promote particular books, authors, or publishers.  I therefore do not participate in "virtual book tours" or conduct author interviews.  You will find no contests or giveaways here.

The blog's nonexclusive focus is on literary/mainstream fiction, thriller/crime/spy novels, and science fiction.  While the reviews cover books old and new, in and out of print, the blog does try to direct attention to books that have been recently published.  Reviews of new (or newly reprinted) books generally appear every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.  Reviews of older books appear on occasional weekends.  Readers are invited and encouraged to comment.  See About Tzer Island for more information about this blog, its categorization of reviews, and its rating system.

Friday
Nov272020

In the Black by Patrick S. Tomlinson

Published by Tor on October 13, 2020

In the Black is a fun mix of space opera and military science fiction. It is also a story of interstellar intrigue involving a fragile peace between humans and aliens that may be undermined by traitors on both sides.

Susan Kamala commands a warship owned by the Combined Corporate Defense Fleet. Her cruiser, the Ansari, is patrolling near a colonized planet called Grendel. In relative terms, Grendel is near the treaty line that divides corporate space from free space. A Xre ship commanded by a Xre called Thuk has been quietly picking off recon drones in corporate space. Kamala is not amused. In defiance of orders designed to forestall interstellar war, she launches a clandestine attack that bedevils the Xre.

Ageless Corporation has a controlling interest in Grendel. The CEO of Ageless is Tyson Abington. Although Ageless is in competition with two other major corporations, it has teamed with them on a project involving Grendel. News of the skirmish with the Xre also jeopardize Ageless’ interests if it were publicized. Another of the Ageless projects hits a snag when a bulk carrier returning from a mining operation is infected by a plague. News of the plague leaks, sending investors into a tizzy and leading Abington to suspect there is a spy in his camp. Among Abington’s lesser problems is his executive assistant. She’s an AI but the new body that Abington gifted her at her request has apparently made her horny.

There are also problems on board Thuk’s ship, which seems to have been sabotaged. Those problems force Kamala to choose between war and humanitarian diplomacy as Thuk’s ship nears the treaty line. The problems affect Kamala more directly when the Defense Fleet appears to regard her with disfavor.

The plot builds tension that befits an action novel, but key characters display a sense of humor that balances the tension. Kamala, Abington, and Thuk all have convincing personalities that add credibility to the story. Patrick S. Tomlinson’s intelligent plot emphasizes diplomacy as much as military conflict and takes a surprising twist by the novel’s end. The story does not end at that point, however, as In the Black is the first novel in a series. Since the novel moves quicky and is free of padding, the story merits another novel.

RECOMMENDED

Wednesday
Nov252020

Happy Thanksgiving!

Monday
Nov232020

Aphasia by Mauro Javier Cárdenas

Published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux on November 3, 2020

Aphasia consists of a handful of sentences. The sentences roam and meander for pages before marching to a halt. To his credit, Mauro Javier Cárdenas breaks up the sentences with commas and dashes and parentheticals so that, with a bit of concentration, it’s possible to follow them to the end. Aphasia isn’t Ulysses. Still, the style makes Aphasia a challenge to read. Readers who admire “page turners” with short sentences and five paragraph chapters — techniques that create the illusion of a fast-moving plot by giving the reader little content to test their attention spans — might detest Aphasia.

Antonio is a reader. Antonio's narrative makes reference to various works of literature, often drawing parallels to his own life. Antonio has two daughters and an ex-wife. He works as a database analyst for an insurance company. He thinks of himself as playing at that job while he writes a novel. For twelve years, Antonio has spent his free time working on a novel that is set in Bogotá. To that end he interviews and records his mother, Leonora, both to get information about family history and to find a voice in which to tell the story.

Much of Aphasia consists of transcribed or recalled conversations and Antonio’s editorial asides. In addition to conversations with Leonora, we read about Antonio’s conversations with his ex-wife Ida (who tells Antonio stories about her Czech parents) and his sister Estela. Antonio learns from them that his father sexually abused his sister and a stepdaughter, but Estela insists that their mother sexually abused Antonio. Since Estela suffers from a serious mental illness, it is difficult to separate her delusions from reality, although the illness appears to have developed later in her life, after she finished college. Leonora, however, believes that her husband abused Estela because she has heard stories about incestuous behavior within his family. Where the truth lies is something of a mystery to Antonio and the reader.

In any event, Antonio feels pained about his role in having his sister institutionalized. Later, after her release, Estela faces criminal charges for an incident with a knife and fears deportation — yet another source of anxiety for Antonio. He also has reservations about his dating site hookups, particularly when his neighbors lodge noise complaints that anger his ex-wife.

To what do these long sentences add up? By the end, Aphasia reads as a domestic drama told from Antonio’s ambivalent point of view. The novel’s title refers to (in Antonio’s words) “inability to comprehend and form language because of a dysfunction in specific brain regions” but Antonio tells us that it is also a metaphor for excessive paralysis, an apt description of Antonio’s life. The one lesson that Antonio internalizes from the people he’s talked to is that no matter how you live your life, it slips away. You need to figure out what you want to do and do it before it’s lights out. It’s always good to be reminded of that, although it’s a fairly common theme.

I’m not sure why Cárdenas’ settled on this writing style — run-on sentences that go on for pages. I assume he was trying to make a point but I struggled to grasp it. Life is challenging and so is my writing?

Is Aphasia worth the challenge? Some aspects of the novel, including recollections of life in Columbia and Czechia, are interesting, as is Estela’s paranoia about her family and Barack Obama. But Antonio isn’t very interesting. I’m not usually thrilled with novels by writers who write about being writers, while Antonio’s observations about more substantial literary figures add little to the story. The novel peters out without resolving any of the storylines in Antonio’s present and it’s never clear that he learned the full story of his parents’ past. In the end, this novel of Antonio’s ambivalence left me ambivalent.

RECOMMENDED WITH RESERVATIONS

Friday
Nov202020

The Golden Cage by Camilla Läckberg

Published in Sweden in 2019; published in translation by Knopf on July 7, 2020

The Golden Cage might be characterized as a female empowerment thriller. The protagonist, Faye, had an abusive father, although he generally saved his physical abuse for Faye’s mother. Faye went on to forego a college education so that she could stay home and raise children after using her business acumen to help her husband grow rich. When he betrays her by having endless affairs before dumping her in favor of a younger woman and leaving her penniless, she vows to get revenge. She believes that “no act of vengeance could be too brutal” for a husband who cheated her out the life she feels she deserved. She also vows to empower other women to seek vengeance again the evil men who betray them.

The reality is that women betray men in growing numbers — although probably not as often as men betray women — and that women are becoming more willing to admit their infidelity, perhaps because it empowers them to do so. While it is easy to be sympathetic with anyone who has been betrayed, Camilla Läckberg’s caricature of Faye’s husband as an evil man and his wife as a victim who is justified in seeking revenge is hard to take seriously. It was, after all, Faye’s choice to end her career. It was Faye’s choice to stay with Jack long after his narcissistic nature became apparent. It was Faye’s choice to help Jack with his business, even as Jack took credit for her efforts. It was her choice to say yes when Jack asked her to get a boob job. Faye has little insight into the role she played in her own destruction.

Even so, I might have been sympathetic to Faye if she hadn’t become obsessed with revenge. When Faye involves her innocent daughter in a scheme to get even with her ex-husband, I lost what little sympathy I could muster for her cause. I don’t know if Faye is meant to be a role model, an example of how strong women can prevail, but she isn’t someone I would want a child to emulate. Flashbacks to Faye’s childhood only enhance the reader’s perception that Faye has a long pattern of being driven by revenge and self-pity.

The plot requires the reader to believe too many impossible things at once. Having been rendered penniless, Faye starts a dog walking service and leverages her capital to create, almost overnight, an incredibly successful cosmetics company. Who knew that financial success can be achieved so easily? She enlists the support of powerful women in her company by branding it as a crusade against men, then uses her financial might to take down Jack’s company. To do that, she needs to seduce Jack again — multiple times — all the while comparing Jack in excessive detail to the new stud lover who made her realize that Jack is incapable of satisfying a woman. Are we supposed to think that this somehow makes Faye any better than Jack?

A shallow plot, a cringe-inducing protagonist, and lurid prose make The Golden Cage a chore to read. Jack is a stereotype of an abusive misogynist male. Faye is a stereotype of a vengeful woman. Blurbs compare The Golden Cage to Gone Girl, but Gone Girl has insightful, nuanced things to say about the way men and women relate to each other. The ultimate point of Gone Girl is that revenge is a dish best left unserved. While the Golden Cage reads like an attempt to rip off the premise of Gone Girl, it is an unimaginative revenge fantasy that fails to explore the moral implications of the protagonist’s immoral actions. The twist ending attempts to double down on Gone Girl but it is too derivative to be effective. I really don’t understand why this book was a success in any language.

NOT RECOMMENDED

Wednesday
Nov182020

Marauder by Clive Cussler and Boyd Morrison

Published by G.P. Putnam's Sons on November 10, 2020

Clive Cussler was a prolific and popular writer when he was alive. He died earlier this year. Judging by the ongoing production of the Robert Ludlum and Robert Parker factories, death doesn’t stand in the way of churning out new books. Marauder is co-authored by Boyd Morrison. The degree to which Cussler contributed to the book is unclear. Since most (maybe all but the first) of Cussler’s “Oregon Files” novels were co-authored (several with Morrison), it probably doesn’t matter.

Marauder is the name of a trimaran that bad guys have equipped with a plasma weapon. It battles Captain Juan Cabrillo and the crew of the newly refurbished Oregon who have abundant weapons of their own. Shootouts ensue.

Marauder doesn’t even attempt a plausible plot. It isn’t the kind of novel that really needs one, although thrillers tend to be better when they fall within the realm of realism. This is basically a novelized action movie. Since the thrills come from the action, giving much thought to why the thrills are happening is perhaps an unwelcome distraction. And yes, the story is entirely predictable. Well, we wouldn’t want the bad guys to win, would we?

The premise involves the Chinese, the current boogeymen for people who need to believe in boogymen. Angus Polk, a senior analyst in the Australian Department of Defence, is married to April Jin, an intelligence officer in the Australian navy. They both served time for selling military secrets to a Chinese company owned by Lu Yang. Although Yang recently died, he spread some money around and got his two spies an early release from prison. Now he wants to leave his vast fortune to Polk and Jin on the condition that they carry out his final plan.

Yang has whipped up a new weapon, a gas that paralyzes people. If an antidote is not administered within one week, the paralysis becomes permanent. Yang’s plan is to paralyze everyone in Sydney and sell the antidote to rich people. More nefarious, however, is the notion that Australia will be flooded with Chinese caretakers for all the people who don’t get an antidote. This influx of Chinese will somehow give the Chinese a hidden army in Australia. Unless, of course, Australia opts to import caretakers from the Philippines or other Asian countries that have a long history of training caretakers. Details, details.

As the bad guys move forward, a bunch of people — including one of Juan’s team — become paralyzed, giving Juan and crew a mere week to find the antidote. Naturally, the antidote is made from a nut that only grows in a couple of remote places, so our heroes need to traipse around groves of nut trees (where more shootouts ensue) before engaging in last-minute heroics as the confront Polk and Jin.

The plot is full of holes. The dialog is wooden. Characterization is an afterthought. But there’s plenty of action and some of it is exciting. Fans of action novels could do worse. Fans of good books could do better.

RECOMMENDED WITH RESERVATIONS