Losing Faith by Adam Mitzner
Monday, April 13, 2015 at 10:59AM 
Published by Gallery Books on April 14, 2015
Aaron Littman heads a high powered  New York law firm. He is surprised when he is asked to take on the  criminal defense of Nicolai Garkov, who is charged with securities and  bank fraud and suspected of terrorism. Garkov's trial, just a month  away, has been reassigned to Judge Faith Nichols. Neither Littman nor  Nichols want anything to do with Garkov's case, but Garkov knows how to  get what he wants. Littman finds himself with a Hobson's choice:  refuse  Garkov and lose his career or do Garkov's bidding and risk losing much  more.
What begins as a simple blackmail story takes an ominous  turn about a third of the way through the novel and an even sharper turn  at the midway point. Losing Faith addresses a murder accusation, the  usual focus of courtroom dramas, and challenges the reader to guess who  committed the murder. It does those things quite well.
Losing  Faith paints a bleak but accurate picture of life for lawyers in large  corporate firms ... if you can call it a life. Adam Mitzner is spot on  about the willingness (indeed, eagerness) of large corporate law firms  to put profits ahead of principles. The novel's political dynamics  (Faith has a shot at a Supreme Court nomination but only if Garkov is  convicted and sentenced to the max) reflect a jaded view, but it is also  a realistic view of how the career path of a judge is influenced by  politics and grandstanding more than the judge's fidelity to the law.
The  novel also offers bleak but accurate insights into how the criminal  justice system railroads innocent people. It includes a fair amount of  the "inside baseball" that makes a courtroom drama credible, all of it  presented from a knowledgeable perspective. It accurately depicts how  prosecutors can use the immense power of the government to coerce  witnesses into giving testimony that will help secure a conviction. Not  that, by the novel's end, the defense lawyers come across as any more  ethical than the prosecutors. Most courtroom dramas paint either  prosecutors or defense attorneys as knights in shining armor, but Losing  Faith exposes the ugly truth that in many instances, both sides care  only about winning and are willing to sacrifice their integrity to  achieve that goal.
The courtroom scenes are riveting and the  underlying mystery is a good one. My only significant objection is that  the murder accusation is based on evidence that is not only  circumstantial but weak -- so weak that I doubt a prosecutor would have  based an indictment on it. While the story depends upon readers  believing the government had a strong case, the prosecution's case  seemed quite doubtful to me. That's a small complaint, however, and one that  did not impair my overall enjoyment of the story.
If the reveal  of the murderer at the novel's end is not entirely unexpected, Losing  Faith has the virtue of being a novel that never overreaches. Too many  courtroom dramas (and mysteries in general) rely on preposterous endings  to achieve the element of surprise, but Losing Faith never produces an  eye-rolling moment. While not quite on the level of Presumed Innocent (still  the gold standard of courtroom dramas), Losing Faith tells a credible,  satisfying, attention-grabbing story with flawed (and thus realistic)  characters who are nevertheless sympathetic.
RECOMMENDED
Reader Comments